A mom, a dad, and three cute kids.
Tag Archives: politics

Randy Alcorn article

by nathan

Randy Alcorn has a way with words that I don’t have. Perhaps that’s how he is able to make his living as an author! I’ve debated whether I should post this link or not. For those of you who may not agree with me politically, I hope you can at least respect that I stand up for what I believe. I am not willing to take the gamble that the abortion rates might continue to go down regardless of the President. The truth is we really don’t know what would happen with a Congress and President who are both committed to removing all restrictions on abortion. If it was a good friend or family member whose life was at stake, would I be willing to take that chance? I’m disallowing comments because I don’t wont this blog to turn into a place for debate. I’m really not assuming that I am going to change anyone’s mind, but I thought this would be a good explanation for why I feel strongly about this.

http://randyalcorn.blogspot.com/2008/10/im-not-voting-for-man-im-voting-for.html

Here’s a quote from the article:

Now, when someone says, “But still, abortion isn’t the only issue,” I
agree. I care very much about the poor and racial equality. That’s why if John
McCain was committed to legalizing the killing of the poor and the killing of
ethnic minorities, I would not vote for him either. But suppose you have two
candidates, one who has promised to defend and further the legalized killing of
one group of people (any group: women, minorities, disabled, unborn, poor.) You
disagree with the other candidate in areas that in their own right might be
important, but do not involve the merciless slaughter of millions of people.
Furthermore, the second candidate—whom you consider boring and
disagreeable—believes that same group of people has the right to live, and he
says he will defend their rights, and appoint judges who will defend it. Now,
which candidate should you vote for?If neither candidate were committed to the
legalized killing of people, any people, then I would say, by all means weigh
and measure those other important issues and make your choice. But can you
seriously argue that these other issues trump the killing of millions of
innocent children, not just now, but in the decades to come under a proabortion
Supreme Court that could have been a prolife Supreme Court?


So, I guess I’m posting at least one more political entry

by nathan

Ten Reasons to Oppose the Wall Street Bailout
1. NO REFORM: The plan
attempts to mask, rather than reform, imbalances in credit markets and in U.S.
economic public policy. The plan props up reckless and failed banks by buying
“troubled assets” instead of focusing on real reforms that go after government
sponsored culprits Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and sustainable policies that
will increase the availability of private capital and expanded economic
growth.
2. TREASURY POWER GRAB: The plan raises Constitutional
concerns by dramatically expanding the power of the current and future Treasury
Secretaries, giving the government agency power to directly purchase assets from
for-profit financial and non-financial firms.
3. STUNNING PRICE TAG: The $700
billion bailout figure is as much money as the combined annual budgets of the
Departments of Defense, Education and Health and Human Services. It amounts to
$2,300 for every man, woman, and child in America.
4. INCREASES
NATIONAL DEBT: Instead of cutting spending elsewhere, Congress will borrow all
$700 billion on global capital markets, and the bill raises the national debt
ceiling to a staggering $11.3 trillion.
5. GLOBAL BAILOUT: The plan includes
taxpayer purchases of distressed assets from foreign banks.
6. HURTS
RESPONSIBLE AMERICAN BANKS: The plan punishes responsible U.S. banks by keeping
reckless, insolvent investment banks in business. As BB&T CEO John Allison
wrote in a letter to Congress on Sept. 23rd, “….this is primarily a bailout of
poorly run financial institutions…. Corrections are not all bad. The market
correction process eliminates irrational competitors.”
7. FLAWED PROCESS:
Members of Congress and the public will have less than 24 hours and no hearings
to discuss and understand the impact of this sweeping plan. This rush to pass a
wildly unpopular plan without benefit of significant public debate and input
will also undermine its legitimacy and effectiveness.
8. BY WALL STREET, FOR
WALL STREET: Treasury Secretary Paulson, the architect of the plan, was formerly
the head of Goldman Sachs, one of the firms responsible for the mess and a
direct beneficiary of the bailout. Further, the advisers managing the
bailout auctions and assets will be Wall Street firms and will likely receive
billions of tax dollars in fees.
9. OTHER OPTIONS NOT EXHAUSTED: The idea
that taxpayers will make money on the bailout is not credible. There are ready
buyers for these “troubled assets” — Merrill Lynch sold its entire portfolio of
mortgage backed securities in July– provided the price is low enough. If a
profit was possible, private speculators would readily buy these troubled
assets.
10. MORALLY OFFENSIVE: The plan violates basic principles of American
capitalism and honest governance by creating a system of “private profits,
socialized losses” that transfers money from taxpayers directly to Wall Street
investment banks. Free market capitalism only functions if individuals and firms
are held accountable and are allowed to both succeed and profit, and also to
sustain losses and even fail.

This is from http://nowallstreetbailout.com/why2.php


Political arguments are making me crazy

by nathan

I don’t want to make this blog about politics. So, I’m going to make this post and then leave it alone.

Dear American citizens,

We are very priviledged to live in a country where we get to freely vote for whatever candidate we choose. There are many societies that don’t get to do that. Have you ever stopped to think about what an amazing thing it is, that after a presidential election, power changes hands so seamlessly? It’s pretty cool!
I plan to vote. I don’t think my candidate is perfect. I don’t agree with everything he has said and done personally and politically. I don’t think I’m more spiritual or any more of a Christian than someone who doesn’t vote the way that I do. I am going to assume that you are making an informed decision when you cast your vote. Fans of the person who is getting my vote will say negative things about the opposition. Fans of the person who is not getting my vote will say negative things about their opposition. There are truths and lies on both sides.

Guess what? I don’t care to hear it anymore.

I’m planning on voting on the issues. I hope you do too. Find out what are the non-negotiables for you, and vote accordingly. There probably isn’t a perfect candidate out there that agrees with you on every last thing, but make a good faith effort to find out all you can about the things that you think matter most and vote your conscience.

That said, I believe that there is a lot of power in politics, but I don’t put my faith in politicians. If my candidate doesn’t win the election, I wont be devastated. God has no less power with one party in office over another. Obedience to God’s leading in my everyday life is the most important thing.


Scrappy Theme by Caroline Moore | Copyright 2012 thefritzes.net | Powered by WordPress